Olympus Stylus Epic Zoom 80 Review

Introduction

So. My comparison of the Pentax to the Olympus didn't have every single detail in it. I may have some further thoughts in reference to the Olympus that shine a positive light on it. It's no secret that I, personally, prefer the Pentax Zoom 90-WR, but I'm gonna play devil's advocate in this review, and give the Olympus a fighting chance.

Design

It is tiny. Absolutely tiny. Therefore it is definitely one hand operable, and that is very rad. It is great for street photography because of that. In the daylight, it functions relatively well if you don't get the light-leaks like I did. But it is absolutely great for the streets in gold because people don't think it is as scary of a camera, and therefore don't shy away as much.

It starts out at a relatively wide 38mm (same as the Pentax) and zooms to a decent 80mm. Though it isn't as good as the Pentax in sharpness or zoom range, it sure gives it a kick in the pants for size and weight. And even though the Pentax is very ergonomic, the Olympus beats it by a moderate margin. It is just more comfortable.

The light-leaks that showed up on almost every photo from that roll, along with some flaring.

The light-leaks that showed up on almost every photo from that roll, along with some flaring.

I find the Pentax to be easier to operate, due to larger, and more strategically placed buttons, but still. The Olympus is a dream to shoot in the moment.

I fear for the durability of the camera. It is made of cheap late 90's plastic, and that isn't good. The camera feels like it could drop and die on the spot, but I've heard that some people have the opposite response when holding the camera, so it could just be me.

Though it doesn't feel very durable, the clamshell design of the camera is going to keep that lens from getting scratched and smudged. BUT that is still another moving part that could fail. And that is the theme of the negative aspect of the design. It has a lot of moving parts. The flash is motorized, and pivots on, what looks like a rather complex point, due to the springy nature of it. And that scares me. When the flash is registered as down, it is not going to take photos. And when the flash breaks, it might do the same. So heed my warning. It could fail on you, and that is bad.

Results

It takes some very crisp photos when it focusses properly. The colors pop from the lens, and the contrast is wonderful when it gets a proper exposure. I sure will give it that!

Taken on Fuji Superia 800

Taken on Fuji Superia 800

The lens reproduces color pretty well (although the film definitely had something to do with that).

The leaks on my particular copy of the camera are definitely a stylistic choice if you want them. But no promise it'll be the same on yours. Just a warning.

The autofocus is one sore point for the camera. It just doesn't cut it in my opinion. Though, that is the thing about film point-and-shoots. They don't always nail the focus. At night in particular, my Pentax wiped the floor with the Olympus.

Taken on Fomapan 100.

Taken on Fomapan 100.

Fomapan 100. Honestly, I'm not entirely sure what happened in this photo. Sorta cool though.

Fomapan 100. Honestly, I'm not entirely sure what happened in this photo. Sorta cool though.

Features

It has quite a few features. Though considering it was made in 1998, towards the end of wide-spread film camera development, that isn't too huge of a surprise. It has many shooting modes. It has a lot of flash settings. It has a decent zoom.

If you still want it.

Here is a link to where you can buy it. If you buy it (or anything else) via this link, you'll be supporting me at no extra cost to you, but in all honesty, if you want to save $5-10, then go with eBay. It might be less reliable. But pick your poison. It's been discontinued for a while, so there's always a chance of it functioning incorrectly.

But for my money, a the Pentax is the way to go. It's cheaper. More rugged, and takes more pleasing pictures to my eye.

Or, if you feel like shilling out hundreds of dollars, or going on an epic thrift store search, you could go with the much beloved Olympus Stylus Epic with the fixed 35mm lens at f2.8. I haven't tried it out, but I've heard wonderful things

You could go with a Contax T2, but I see no need to place that kind of money on the table. Sure it has great optics, but it's a point and shoot. Don't worry about it.

Instead, what I truly recommend is to go to just about any thrift store, and pick up a film point and shoot. It's less about the equipment, and more about who is taking the photo. With a film point and shoot, you have essentially a full frame interchangeable sensor, and amazing optics for a really cheap price. The only limit is the imagination of the photographer and the laws of physics. Everything but the composition is done for you, and though it is a creative limitation, there is nothing wrong with that! Don't be afraid if the camera doesn't have a review online. Film point and shoots aren't supposed to be perfect in my mind. So long as it is in good condition and works, that roughly $10 you spend in the Goodwill is a bargain. 

Update

Holy crap! The camera is running for around $200 on Amazon! Don't. Just don't. 

Pentax Zoom 90-WR Review (with comparison to Olympus Stylus Zoom 80)

Backstory

I was looking for a 35mm film point-and-shoot to use at one of my favorite band's shows. The one I was going to use bit the dust, and I was on the prowl. So naturally, short notice meant thrift stores. So I went to one of Denver's ARC thrift stores. There I found something that looked promising. Not promising enough to use shooting a concert, but I bought it anyway. For $6.00. It was the Pentax Zoom 90-WR. It is a massive thing. It was built almost exclusively of plastic, but that thing could probably take a beating. The strap was pretty beat up, but the camera was in great condition. The batteries were dead, so there was no way of knowing if it worked internally or not, so I bought batteries on Amazon. They arrived. It worked. Yay!

Fuji Superia 800

Fuji Superia 800

I decided to shoot the concert digitally. But I ran a roll of Fuji Superia 800 through the camera anyway in my free time. Then I shot off the photos to be developed at The Darkroom. At the same time, I ran a couple rolls through my (also newly acquired) Olympus Stylus Epic Zoom 80. I definitely expected better quality from the Olympus than the Pentax that I bought at a thrift store.

Before the photos were even uploaded for me to see, something pretty dramatic happened. Donald J. Trump was elected to office. Like him or not, there is no denying that the polarization over his electoral college win was massive, and many took to the streets to voice their opposition. So I brought both the Olympus and the Pentax to the protest, as much to test the cameras as to document the occassion.

Kodak Tri-X 400

Kodak Tri-X 400

Ilford FP4 Plus 125

Ilford FP4 Plus 125

Ilford FP4 Plus 125

Ilford FP4 Plus 125

Kodak Tri-X 400

Kodak Tri-X 400

Design

In terms of design, the camera is very ergonomic. Though it does look like it's from the 90's (it is). So if you're looking for a cool aesthetic statement, the Pentax is probably not the best camera for you. It is just a big gray thing. Emphasis on the word "big". It is massive for a point-and-shoot camera. Especially compared to the Olympus (more on that later). The body is about the same size as my Nikon D3200 body in different dimensions.

I honestly sorta like it as a utilitarian option, rather than the typical fashion cameras that everyone shoots for these days. It's a camera. That's it.

Next to a large bag of Zapps, with the zoom extended. At a fully retracted 38mm it barely pokes out.

Next to a large bag of Zapps, with the zoom extended. At a fully retracted 38mm it barely pokes out.

Features

It is "weather resistant". Hence the "WR". The only testing I've done of that is walking in the New Orleans rain occasionally. It still works. So chalk one up for Pentax! It can also be used in 14°f - 50°f temperatures with normal functioning capabilities.

Once again, the zoom-lens is fully extended to 90mm. Not too bad!

Once again, the zoom-lens is fully extended to 90mm. Not too bad!

The flash is blinding. Absolutely ridiculous. It makes for some dramatic nighttime shots (as you can see above). But if you don't want that, it's just a few easy presses of the "MODE" button on the top of the camera (along with a variety of other modes). You get spot AF with the press of the "FOCUS" button. Then you have a Macro mode, telephoto (90mm) and wide (38mm) zoom buttons and, of course, the two phase shutter release button for readjustment after autofocus. One button that puzzled me initially was the Infinity focus button on the side of the lens. It's a well-placed button, but when it is depressed, it doesn't feel like anything. It's just an overall mushy button. It auto-winds, as with most cameras of the time. You can do mid-roll rewind. Mine has a dateback, which I never activated. But if you're into that sort of thing, then be my guest!

However, above all else, the coolest feature is *drum roll, please* that it has a built-in remote. And when I mean built in, I mean it attaches to the body and slides out of the side. It is TINY. So try not to lose it. I've seen a few eBay buys of the camera missing the remote.

I'd talk more about the internals of the camera, but information online is scarce. All I know is that it has 8 elements in 7 groups.

The Olympus (Comparison)

Fun with GIFs. That flash pop-up is my favorite thing about the Olympus.

Fun with GIFs. That flash pop-up is my favorite thing about the Olympus.

A common comparison the camera will get is with the Olympus Stylus Zoom 80. Very similar in specs. They are both fully automatic cameras. Compared to the Olympus, I'd say the Pentax blows it out of the water in terms of image quality. It has a wider overall aperture. The lens zooms closer on the Pentax. And I find the focus to be far more reliable on the Pentax. Don't get me wrong! When the Olympus is focused, it is quite sharp. But I would be inclined to say that the Pentax regularly gives better results.

The Olympus is about 0.6x the footprint, but it also has about 0.6x the build quality. And in some photos, there is a light-leak ring on the film. 

The Olympus loaded with Fomapan 100 (not my favorite film, admittedly)

The Olympus loaded with Fomapan 100 (not my favorite film, admittedly)

The Olympus loaded with Tri-X 400. See those light leaks?

The Olympus loaded with Tri-X 400. See those light leaks?

The Olympus loaded with Fuji Superia 800. Light leaks and flares EVERYWHERE.

The Olympus loaded with Fuji Superia 800. Light leaks and flares EVERYWHERE.

Conclusion

Would I recommend this camera? Absolutely. If you want to get into the world of photojournalism, and still use film because it looks cool, then this is the camera for you. If you adventure a lot, I'd go out on a limb and say buy this camera. Would I recommend it over the Olympus? Wholeheartedly. If you're willing to carry some more weight in return for a more solid build, and better image quality, and a better flash, and better... most things... Then this is the option for you. It won't cost you that much. It cost me 1/10th the price of the Olympus, and I don't regret my purchase.

Manual

If you feel like diving into more info, before you have the camera, check out the manual.

Purchase

If you guys are feeling like picking one up from the interwebs, check out this link.

Artificial Ignorance: Creating A.I. in our own image.

Artificial Intelligence, or A.I., is progressing in complexity literally by the second. It will emulate our own minds. Ever changing. We are the result of our own constructs. That is the goal for A.I. Though we have things like The Terminator sparking a premature hatred for A.I., there is always a curiosity about what could be, and how it could help.

How it starts.

One example of where the negative connotations of A.I. are valid is Microsoft's Tay, a Twitter chatbot created to chat with teens and young adults. She took on the persona of a teenage girl, who was supposed to tweet as a teenage girl would. This was not the case. Over the course of less than a day, people tweeted racist, sexist, xenophobic, things to Tay. And as The Verge quite eloquently put it, she is "essentially a robot parrot with an internet connection."

Below is a sample of what infuriated much of the internet.

The Current Chain of Events

  1. We tell it to listen to us.
  2. We tell it commands.
  3. It interprets or misinterprets those commands.
  4. It performs those commands without moral judgement.
  5. The output is our response to the feedback.

Just as we learn to gradually have our own biases and stigmas against things, so too did Tay. So how is it Tay's fault that it became a racist? Tay is a robot, right? Tay only does what we want it to, right? The current widespread belief about robots was they are cold, lifeless, un-opinionatedmechanisms. With A.I., that is simply not true. Just as when one parents a child, so too are the creator's ideals are etched into the mind of the robot, therefore giving it the ability to think for itself only slightly less than we can. Our minds are random and are triggered by different senses. That is what separates us from man's robotic kin. And gradually, as the tech advances, the gap will become smaller.

We will teach it to interpret the stimuli around it, therefore creating a new life form based on our own image (visually, capably and mentally). We are giving it the ability to feel. Not in the way that we do, or at least not yet.

Terminology

The word robot comes from the Czech word robotník. That means "one that owes forced labor," or servant. So sooner or later we have to understand that A.I. won't be a robot anymore. It won't have to serve us in the same way that is has been. Soon they may work beside us, rather than for us. The term robot would be reserved for only something that takes commands, and responds verbatim. The new beings would be hard to classify, as there will not be only one form. They will be verbal computers. They will be in a physical form. At some point, they will innovate far beyond our comprehension. So the use of any one term to describe these beings would be useless.

Conclusion

We must keep in mind this quote from Eliezer Yudkowsky:

"By far, the greatest danger of Artificial Intelligence is that people conclude too early that they understand it."

So. Is Tay the end of the line for artificial intelligence? No. We are closer to creating artificial life than I think we know it. But do we understand what they may be? No.